Forum Discussion
IS it best to separate the 2.4 ghz and 5 ghz wifi channels?
- Hace 8 meses
I would also use the hybrid 2.4 and 5 GHz network which auto-selects the band and channel for each device as the primary network. I don't know if there is a proper name for it; I call it the "default" network because that is how the gateways are configured out of the box. A separate 2.4 GHz network, with lesser security if needed, can be added for older devices or ones that won't connect to the default network.
Before I had the T-Mobile gateway, I used a Netgear Nighthawk 802.11ac router. It had both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. I set up connections for my TV to both. Occasionally (maybe once a month), the TV would lose its connection to one and I'd have to go into its settings to switch to the other. I have not had to do that in the year that I have had it connected to the default network on the T-Mobile gateway.
I have not had any trouble with any of my devices in my home, except for the ancient desktop computer and printer which would not work with the WPA2/WPA3 + AES security on the default network; and they are so old, they don't recognize 5 GHz signals either. I made a 2.4 GHz WPA/WPA2 + TKIP/AES network just for them.
I have not seen a reason to add a dedicated 5 GHz network in my home.
If you’re referring to naming each band separately to divide them, then no.
This eliminates modern algorithms from choosing the best signal between the two identically named options, in a relatively faster/hassle-free manner, as opposed to two differently named WiFi bands, which will not optimize with the same level of agility.
If that doesn’t make sense, please let me know and I can elaborate based on your specific interests.
Contenido relacionado
- Hace 3 años
- Hace 2 años
- Hace 10 meses
- Hace 2 años