Forum Discussion
Has ping / tracert been blocked on 5g network?
Before yesterday (10/17/2022), I’ve always had a command prompt window (MS Windows) up running a constant ping at 3 second interval - so I can tell when the network starts to degrade or just stops responding (which has become very frequent in the last few months).
As of yesterday morning, both ping and tracert commands consistently fail. As in no longer any response. So it appears the ports used for those commands are now being blocked on the 5g network?
I have a 5g phone on Tmobile, and I see the same result. On 5g with hotspot turned on, with computer connected, ping and tracert fail 100%. If I force the phone to use LTE and stay off 5g, ping and tracert start working again. Don't really understand why Tmobile would block such a basic network analysis command.
This is in downtown Scottsdale AZ. As a sidenote, service on the 5g network degrades consistently every day after about 8am, and usually is consistently bad all weekend long. Works great before 8am most days.
- iTinkeralotBandwidth Buff
Hopefully it is just a matter of time and not too much longer.
- internetfoolNetwork Novice
Freshly rebooted Nokia here in Phoenix, AZ. ICMP still dropping. This is making it tough to work from home and will need to switch internet service soon if not resolved.
--- google.com ping statistics ---
369 packets transmitted, 19 packets received, 94.9% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 53.732/146.891/223.265/45.335 ms
- iTinkeralotBandwidth Buff
I had to reboot my gateway then it worked again. I tested before and after. It may take a bit before it is resolved all over. I hope they intend to fix it back all over.
- jimibakRoaming Rookie
iTinkeralot wrote:
Heads up boys & girls!!
Its back o on the way.
Still no joy in OC NY.
- iTinkeralotBandwidth Buff
Heads up boys & girls!!
Its back o on the way. After the post from castrionfanatic I tested and my Nokia gateway was 27 days and some odd hours uptime and ICMP not passing. I decided to reboot the gateway and try again. Boom! It works. So, a reboot for you may also improve matters. I am in East Tennessee so locations may be different but it is much improved here.
itinkeralot-MBP ~ % ping google.com
PING google.com (173.194.219.138): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=0 ttl=104 time=41.858 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=1 ttl=104 time=47.267 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=2 ttl=104 time=43.141 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=3 ttl=104 time=53.151 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=4 ttl=104 time=44.556 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=5 ttl=104 time=49.542 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=6 ttl=104 time=56.210 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=7 ttl=104 time=41.839 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=8 ttl=104 time=46.823 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=9 ttl=104 time=45.199 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=10 ttl=104 time=42.422 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=11 ttl=104 time=46.108 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=12 ttl=104 time=49.083 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=13 ttl=104 time=41.708 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=14 ttl=104 time=44.228 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=15 ttl=104 time=45.096 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=16 ttl=104 time=45.386 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=17 ttl=104 time=46.104 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=18 ttl=104 time=41.739 ms
64 bytes from 173.194.219.138: icmp_seq=19 ttl=104 time=42.638 ms
^C
--- google.com ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 41.708/45.705/56.210/3.797 ms
- iTinkeralotBandwidth Buff
Well, no gateway bounce here and ICMP packet loss still at 80-85% so no universal resolution yet. Time will tell if they are clearing up the blocking or throttling or whatever they have done that broke it. We will see. Good luck! I hope it shakes out how you want.
- castironfanaticNetwork Novice
Stopping back in to say I can ping reliably again. My tmobile service was out for about 10 minutes this morning and then came back up. I noticed when it came back up I was consistently getting replies when pinging. I will still be switching to the local cable internet provider. Then once the local fiber provider is back up and running I'll be adding that again, at which point I'll be dropping Tmobile. I don't trust them anymore if they will just drop "support" for specific things when they feel like.
- iTinkeralotBandwidth Buff
So I will not argue that the blocking of ICMP is not a problem but to me it portends much larger problems for users. If the trend of cell deployment with overloading and ignoring the rapid decline of content delivery on overloaded cells continues it puts out a very bad message. It becomes about revenue at any cost. If customers are not satisfied they can just go pay more to another ISP and someone else will come take that spot on the network. If the revenue continues to grow that is the bottom line. I could list the warts with content delivery but I am sure some would say that is over exaggerated but the reality is the more bandwidth is throttled, the more ports are blocked, the more applications that fail to function all lead to a lack of customer satisfaction and loyalty. If T-Mobile or any service provider wants to grow a business and maintain integrity they need to treat customers with respect and make an honest effort to do so. I understand cellular internet delivery is expensive and complicated but if it is an important part of the business growth then do it right.
I took the time to write a thank you direct to Matthew Keys at thedesk.net after reading the prior post. Yes, it may be a futile gesture but journalists need to know people appreciate their efforts. Just like a note to say thank your for your article yada yada the "likes" on the community forum for the good and bad are necessary. We don't need to be critical and nasty but sharing the honest truth that there are warts on the system is important to keep the powers that be honest.
- castironfanaticNetwork Novice
Stopping by to say I am also seeing pings fail over in Omaha NE. 86% failure rate. Seeing the same when using test-connection via powershell. Very sad, time to switch back to the cable internet provider I suppose, as much as I hate giving them my money.
- WalkabtRoaming Rookie
I hope more people realized there is an issue, find this post, sign in and post. This has to get to 40 pages in my mind before something happens to make this newsworthy.
Here’s my perspective, I’ve called in on several issues on different products recently, writing to a half dozen companies as a heads up that there are problems and neither issue has been resolved or hit the media.
- Apple Airplay2 functionality is busted in iOS/iPadOS 16 on non-Apple devices. It may, or may not, have to do something with Apple Home App and Matter integration standards. I can find a lot more articles on issues for this topic right now on Reddit and other sites but none appear to connect the dots between products - they are focused on one manufacturer's product, when the issue is Apple AND the manufacturer. From Sonos to Belkin, to receiver manufacturers like Yamaha and Onkyo this is big. This specific issue has been known since July when beta testers were testing the new iOS software and reported it. Airplay2 still works correctly in Mac OS - Ventura. Go to Belkin.com and look up their Soundform Connect and that device's questions page has customers giving it bad reviews because of the issue blaming Belkin for selling the device that doesn't work. Belkin's response has been to please reach out to a special email address to get support. Airplay2 worked, pre iOS 16, then the issues started (the changes in the Home App's code were being implemented due to upcoming Matter integration). While I am significantly impacted having multiple zones in my home using receivers to send AirPlay information to from my phones or iPads, most people probably just use Apple TVs and Apple Home Pod minis and don't experience the issue, since Apple's own devices don't have the issue.
- Amazon has been selling a device for at least two years where each device's ethernet port of that product is hard coded with the same MAC address making them useless on ethernet if you have more than two devices - you can use over WI-FI... There are threads from the US and India on it, but none are more than four pages long. There are now reviews on Amazon saying the issue, I put a review one out there, it was reviewed by Amazon, but the group that received my call, the group that reviewed my review are not the development team and that's who needs to see it OR an executive of the company. There are several options to fix, including spoofing a MAC address in the device firmware but it has gone no where. Too niche of an issue and not newsworthy. These are higher end products, sold by Amazon, and since WI-FI works for most that's the resolution from support.
This issue is too new, and our situation is a little more unique than we may like to admit. It impacts us, and some of us more than others, but the average user probably just thinks it is the "the tower is under construction". Here's the headlines I have seen recently that are newsworthy to T-Mobile
- everyone loves T-Mobile; https://www.tmonews.com/2022/10/t-mobile-earns-highest-score-in-j-d-power-2022-us-business-wireless-satisfaction-study/
- we could be facing an uphill battle - I’ve only seen this report on one site, yet it seems like this is a bigger concern overall, to me. https://thedesk.net/2022/08/t-mobile-home-internet-problems-tower-upgrades/
Contenido relacionado
- Hace 7 meses
- Hace 2 años
- Hace 2 meses
- Hace 6 años